Hyperliquid Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Leading Perpetual DEX

·

1. Executive Summary

Token Overview

Key Highlights

👉 Explore how Hyperliquid outperforms traditional DEXs

2. In-Depth Due Diligence

2.1. Project Overview

Hyperliquid L1 Blockchain

Competitive Edge

2.2. Team Background

Jeff Yan (Co-Founder)

2.3. Business Model

Revenue Streams

  1. Trading Fees: Tiered maker-taker structure (0.003% rebates for Tier 3 market makers).
  2. HLP Vaults:

    • Protocol-managed vaults (17% APY).
    • User-generated vaults with profit-sharing.

Ecosystem Synergy

FeatureHyperliquidCompetitors
Slippage0.01%0.05%+
Daily Volume$4B$1.5B

👉 Why traders prefer Hyperliquid’s deep liquidity

3. Market Dominance

3.1. Performance Metrics

3.2. Financials

4. Tokenomics Deep Dive

Supply Breakdown

Allocation Strategy

Strategic Liquidity

5. FAQs

Q1: How does Hyperliquid’s revenue compare to Ethereum?
A1: It generates higher weekly revenue ($12.8M vs. Ethereum’s $9M) from trading fees.

Q2: What makes HLP vaults unique?
A2: They offer up to 17% APY via algorithmic strategies without management fees.

Q3: Why no major CEX listings?
A3: To retain fee revenue and prevent token dumps—central to its ecosystem growth.

Q4: Is $HYPE a governance token?
A4: Yes, holders vote on listings and network upgrades.

Q5: What’s the risk of validator price feeds?
A5: Short-term discrepancies may cause unfair liquidations (mitigated by Assistance Fund).

6. Conclusion

Hyperliquid redefines DeFi derivatives with unmatched liquidity, fair tokenomics, and a revenue-sharing model. Its avoidance of VC dependency and CEX listings underscores long-term sustainability.

Disclaimer: This analysis is informational—conduct independent research before investing.