Introduction
The NFT marketplace Blur has recently initiated its second phase of airdrops, introducing a unique requirement for participants: users must execute a "bid" action to qualify for the airdrop. This mechanism has sparked confusion and debate within the community. This article delves into Blur's bid logic, examining whether it represents genuine innovation or merely a repackaged approach using platform-specific tokens.
Blur's Bid Mechanism: A Closer Look
The Blur Pool Concept
At first glance, Blur appears to innovate by replacing WETH (Wrapped Ethereum) with its proprietary "Blur Pool." Users must deposit ETH into this pool to place bids, with no restrictions on deposit amounts or withdrawal timing. However, is this truly a bypass of WETH, allowing direct ETH bids?
Transaction Anomalies Uncovered
Upon analyzing transaction records via ScopeProtocol, several inconsistencies emerged:
- Deposit Transaction: When depositing 0.01 ETH into the Blur Pool, the transaction was labeled as "Receive" instead of "Send."
- Withdrawal Transaction: Conversely, withdrawing the same amount was tagged as "Send," with both transactions interacting with a null address (0x000...000).
The "()" Token Revelation
Further investigation revealed:
- Deposits into the Blur Pool trigger the issuance of a new ERC-20 token, "()" (later renamed "Blur Pool()"), which mimics ETH's value but lacks its inherent properties.
- Withdrawals require the destruction of an equivalent amount of "()" tokens to unlock the original ETH.
Key Findings
- No True Innovation: Blur's mechanism simply substitutes WETH with its proprietary token, functioning as an internal platform currency ("fun tokens").
- Audit Concerns: The Blur Pool's smart contract lacks public audit reports, raising transparency issues.
- Token Dynamics: The "()" token operates as a 1:1 ETH placeholder within Blur's ecosystem but holds no external utility or recognition.
FAQ Section
Why does Blur use its own token instead of WETH?
Blur's approach centralizes control within its platform, though it mirrors WETH's functionality without broader blockchain interoperability.
Is the Blur Pool secure without an audit?
The absence of public audit reports undermines trust, as users cannot verify the pool's security or operational integrity.
Can "Blur Pool()" tokens be used outside Blur?
No, these tokens are platform-specific and cannot be exchanged or utilized elsewhere, unlike WETH.
Conclusion
Blur's bid mechanism, while initially appearing innovative, essentially replicates existing solutions with less transparency and utility. The platform's reliance on unaudited contracts and proprietary tokens highlights potential risks for users. For those exploring NFT marketplaces, understanding these nuances is crucial to navigating the space safely.
👉 Discover more about secure NFT trading practices
This analysis underscores the importance of due diligence in decentralized finance (DeFi) and NFT ecosystems. Always verify platform claims and audit statuses before participating.